17
pioneer teachers of the modular education
system about the possible replacement of
SOME by SEI and the struggles they have
been facing to maintain this type of
education, they answered:
SOME is a project to serve rural
communities, where the internet is
not yet of good quality and the
replacement of the presence of
teachers in these communities by an
internet system or TV signal is an
unfeasible project, firstly the
population's culture from the field is
another. It is the contact, the
dialogue with the professionals that
increases learning, staying in front
of a device will not have learning, it
may reduce the high school
completion rate, the quality will be
much lower. And with that, it will
harm the competition for places at
universities between those who live
in the countryside with those who
live in the city, because those who
are in regular high school have
access to a high-quality course and
the internet; today, SOME competes
on equal terms with the regular
system of any city in the state of
Pará. This SEI project is unfeasible,
we have already been to Belém with
the Education Department of the
previous government, the union
continues to discuss this. As for the
government, we are the ones who
work and know the reality of rural
communities in the state of Pará, we
disagree with this project and hope
that the government can give up and
keep SOME working in rural
communities and that it can take it
to others that do not yet have it
(A.N., SOME professor, 2020).
In the same sense, SEI is not
appreciated by the teacher A. C. R, who
works at SOME, and has resisted,
fighting for a quality education to be
offered by the current modular system.
Currently, SOME has been facing
several government attacks to
replace SOME by SEI. Such an
attempt is an affront to the student
from the countryside, as we know
of the scrapping suffered
intentionally by the Modular
Education Organization System,
aiming at discrediting it in favor of
the implementation of SEI, since it
does not offer maintenance of basic
needs for students regarding the
teaching-learning process. Despite
the issues caused by government
neglect, SOME has shown, over the
years, a positive performance in the
educational process, thus
strengthening the struggles of
educators and students in
maintaining in-person classes and
not the cold and inert teaching
proposed by SEI. (A.C.R., SOME
teacher, 2020).
As we can see in the opinions
posted, SEI it's a system not well
regarded by students from the
communities and teachers who work at
SOME. From this perspective, when
questioning the municipality's Secretary
of Education in relation to the system
implemented as a pilot project in one of
the schools in the municipality's rural
area, he points out:
Today we have only one school
with the SEI system, now entering
the 3rd year through media
intervention. I had the opportunity
to follow the classes via the
platform, where the students
observe the classes, they pay
attention to the teacher and then