14
Concatenated to these assertions is the thought of Ávila (2009) that the subject is a
product of all the relationships of which he is a part, conceiving himself by the
... relationships he has had since before he was born and that add to all the ones he performs
throughout his existence. These relationships constitute him in his own psychic apparatus, in
his identity, in his actions, in everything that characterizes him as a concrete subject. (Ávila,
2009, p. 41-42).
Thus, the self is an individual representation due to the fact that it is produced by a
concrete being, but also plural, as such representation is a product of a consciousness that is
formed by the accumulation of collective experiences, controlling impulses and undisclosed
self, mentioned by Sartre, self-reinforcing and influencing identity construction.
Identity, like belonging, is not fixed and finished in a given social context. In the
globalization scenario, identity is much more related to the concept of Translation than to
Tradition. Bauman (2005) points out that identity or identities, given the multiplicity of
identity productions in hybridism, is transitory and is transformed all the time into the fluidity
of relationships.
As already discussed here, the idea of identity linked to belonging to a nation coexists
with the multiplicity of identity as a movement of resistance and maintenance of traditions. In
contemporary times, especially with the internet, the transitory nature of the communities'
identity has become much easier, and, with this, the plurality of identity has been favored.
Manuel Castells (1999), when discussing how identities are constructed, points out that
some identities are formed from movements of resistance and survival to the dominant logic.
These identities, in an attempt to seek security, form communities, transgressing boundaries,
oscillating between Tradition and Translation.
When dealing with children, Woodward (2014) observes that the perception of the self,
the construction of identity, starts after the mirror stage, when they perceive the place of
themselves and the other. With globalization, this perception of oneself and the other tends
towards Translation, as the assimilation and homogenization of the dominant logic are easily
incorporated into its representations.
The representations of the subjects we refer to are understood from the notes of Chartier
(1991) whose concept of representation is constituted as “matrices of constructive practices of
the social world itself” (Chartier, 1991, p. 12) That is, these matrices they correspond to the
way in which the subjects forward a subjective understanding and, therefore, how this
understanding is evidenced in the practical arguments of interpretation, related to the social
space of their belonging or denial, depending on the way they represent such spaces.