Colegiado do Curso de Educação do Campo, da Universidade Federal do Tocantins,
Campus de Tocantinópolis, Departamento ao qual a RBEC está vinculada.
5. Cumprimento do Código de Ética e de Conduta:
autores(as), avaliadores/revisores, editores e equipe editorial da RBEC deverão cumprir
o presente Código de Ética e de Conduta, que entrará em vigor na data de sua
publicação.
A Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, além de incentivar a pesquisa científica, que possa
contribuir para o debate acadêmico nacional e internacional, informará aos leitores sobre
qualquer informação a respeito das publicações, chamadas de artigos, conteúdos da revista e/ou
outras informações relevantes para a comunidade acadêmica e científica, visando incentivar o
debate democrático neste periódico, pautado pelo respeito a todos os envolvidos. Também, a
revista se reserva no direito de, quando for necessário, atualizar e revisar esses Códigos de
Éticas e Condutas.
[EN] ETHICS AND CONDUCT CODES OF THE BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL
EDUCATION (GOOD PRACTICE CODES)
1. Editors:
contribute to improving the journal quality, in order to guarantee the scientific quality of
the texts published in it and their accordance with the Guidelines and Scope of the
RBEC;
clarify any doubts that may eventually arise from revisers, evaluators, authors and
readers regarding the content of the journal, such as publications, evaluations, article
calls and other journal information;
contribute to the scientific quality in the area of Rural Education and education in
general;
avoid ethics and conduct deviations in the journal that could prejudice good practices for
scientific research;
editors shall, where necessary, publish corrections, retractions, and clarifications to the
academic community regarding untruthful publications and/or or distorted or misleading
information presented by the authors, with rigor to scientific truth and respect for the
academic community.
2. Authors:
The authors must avoid any practice that would lead to scientific misconduct, such as
plagiarism and auto-plagiarism, manipulation of research data and information, fraud in
the research and authorship of texts, as well as any other practice that infringes ethics in
the academic/scientific research. Otherwise, the RBEC reserves the right to, in addition
to taking appropriate legal measures, delete permanently from the journal the text
published presenting such practices;
promote the democratic debate in the journal, independently on beliefs, institutions,
localities, among others, guided by respect for all involved;
mention funding agencies that financed or finance the research published in the RBEC;
comply with the RBEC guidelines and publication standards before submitting any work
to the journal.
3. Revisers/Evaluators:
touch upon ethics during the evaluations carried out in the manuscripts received by the
journal;
follow the assessment criteria informed by the RBEC, in the Journal Guidelines;
ensure the scientific quality and evaluation criteria of the journal;
ensure the confidentiality of the material evaluated;
in case of any conflict of interest in the evaluations, revisers and evaluators should
inform the journal editors.
4. Conflict of interests: