Influye el género en la intensidad del eco del cuádriceps femoral en individuos jóvenes y sanos?

Influye el género en la intensidad del eco muscular?

Autores/as

  • Jaquelini Betta Canever Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88906-072, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, Brasil, e-mail: dcs@contato.ufsc.br
  • Betta Laboratório de Biomecânica, Centro de Desportos, Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88036-800, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil, e-mail: biomec.cds@gmail.com
  • Fernando Diefenthaeler Laboratório de Biomecânica, Centro de Desportos, Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88036-800, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil, e-mail: biomec.cds@gmail.com
  • Kelly Mônica Marinho e Lima Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88906-072, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, Brasil, e-mail: dcs@contato.ufsc.br

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20873/abef.2595-0096.v4n1p124133

Palabras clave:

Ultrasonografía, Músculo Esquelético, Análisis de Género

Resumen

Introducción: El análisis de la intensidad del eco (IE) puede obtenerse mediante ultrasonidos a partir de las reflexiones de las ondas ecográficas del tejido y se ha utilizado ampliamente para identificar el daño tisular en el contexto clínico y deportivo. Las mujeres pueden tener más tejido adiposo que los hombres, lo que puede reflejarse en una mayor infiltración de grasa en el músculo y, por tanto, influir en los valores del IE. Objetivo: Comprobar si el género influye en la IE del cuádriceps femoral en individuos jóvenes y sanos. Materiales y métodos: Diecinueve individuos jóvenes y sanos (9 mujeres y 10 hombres; 26,0 ± 7,0 años; 28,0 ± 6,0 kg/m2) participaron en el estudio. Se adquirieron seis imágenes ecográficas de los músculos recto femoral (RF), vasto lateral (VL) y vasto medial (VM), bilateralmente y en reposo. Los valores del IE se establecieron mediante la función de histograma del software ImageJ®, cuya escala de grises va de 0 (negro) a 255 (blanco). Para comparar la IE entre géneros, se utilizó la prueba estadística ANOVA de modelo mixto con un nivel de significación de ≤ 0,05. Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre el IE de los cuádriceps de hombres y mujeres (p = 0,679). Los valores medios de IE encontrados fueron 135,18 ± 11,86, 126,74 ± 14,05 y 131,36 ± 12,81 U.A. para RF, VL y VM, respectivamente. Conclusión: El género no parece influir en los valores del IE del cuádriceps femoral en individuos jóvenes y sanos, lo que puede representar una composición muscular similar entre hombres y mujeres con un índice de masa corporal normal. Otros estudios deberían investigar las diferentes edades y el índice de masa corporal.

Citas

Ishida H, Suehiro T, Suzuki K, Watanabe S. Muscle thickness and echo intensity measurements of the rectus femoris muscle of healthy subjects: Intra and interrater reliability of transducer tilt during ultrasound. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies [Internet]. 2018;22(3):657–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.12.005

Santos R, Armada-da-Silva PAS. Reproducibility of ultrasound-derived muscle thickness and echo-intensity for the entire quadriceps femoris muscle. Radiography [Internet]. 2017;23(3):e51–61. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.011

Sahlani L, Thompson L, Vira A, Panchal AR. Bedside ultrasound procedures: musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2016;42(2):127–38.

Pigula-Tresansky AJ, Wu JS, Kapur K, Darras BT, Rutkove SB, Anthony BW. Muscle compression improves reliability of ultrasound echo intensity. Muscle & nerve. 2018 Mar;57(3):423–9.

Pillen S, Tak RO, Zwarts MJ, Lammens MMY, Verrijp KN, Arts IMP, et al. Skeletal Muscle Ultrasound: Correlation Between Fibrous Tissue and Echo Intensity. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2009;35(3):443–6.

Caresio C, Molinari F, Emanuel G, Minetto MA. Muscle echo intensity: Reliability and conditioning factors. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2015;35(5):393–403.

Young HJ, Jenkins NT, Zhao Q, Mccully KK. Measurement of intramuscular fat by muscle echo intensity. Muscle and Nerve. 2015;52(6):963–71.

Heckmatt JZ, Dubowitz V, Leeman S. Detection of Pathological Change in Dystrophic Muscle With B-Scan Ultrasound Imaging. The Lancet. 1980;315(8183):1389–90.

Isaka M, Sugimoto K, Yasunobe Y, Akasaka H, Fujimoto T, Kurinami H, et al. The Usefulness of an Alternative Diagnostic Method for Sarcopenia Using Thickness and Echo Intensity of Lower Leg Muscles in Older Males. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association [Internet]. 2019;20(9):1185.e1-1185.e8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.152

Ticinesi A, Meschi T, Narici M V., Lauretani F, Maggio M. Muscle Ultrasound and Sarcopenia in Older Individuals: A Clinical Perspective. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association [Internet]. 2017;18(4):290–300. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.013

Bali AU, Harmon KK, Burton AM, Phan DC, Mercer NE, Lawless NW, et al. Muscle strength, not age, explains unique variance in echo intensity. Experimental gerontology. 2020 Oct;139:111047.

Mayans D, Cartwright MS, Walker FO. Neuromuscular Ultrasonography: Quantifying Muscle and Nerve Measurements. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2012;23(1):133–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2011.11.009

Hermsdorff H, Monteiro J. Visceral, Subcutaneous or Intramuscular Fat: Where Is The Problem? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2004;48:804–9. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abem/v48n6/a05v48n6.pdf

Fuente-Martín E, Argente-Arizón P, Ros P, Argente J, Chowen JA. Sex differences in adipose tissue: It is not only a question of quantity and distribution. Adipocyte [Internet]. 2013;2(3):128–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23991358%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3756100

Wong V, Spitz RW, Bell ZW, Viana RB, Chatakondi RN, Abe T, et al. Exercise induced changes in echo intensity within the muscle: a brief review. Journal of Ultrasound [Internet]. 2020;23(4):457–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00424-y

Stock MS, Oranchuk DJ, Burton AM, Phan DC. Age-, sex-, and region-specific differences in skeletal muscle size and quality. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2020;45(11):1253–60.

Lanferdini FJ, Manganelli BF, Lopez P, Klein KD, Cadore EL, Vaz MA. Echo Intensity Reliability for the Analysis of Different Muscle Areas in Athletes. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2019 Dec;33(12):3353–60.

Arts IMP, Pillen S, Schelhaas HJ, Overeem S, Zwarts MJ. Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle and Nerve. 2010;41(1):32–41.

Wong V, Abe T, Chatakondi RN, Bell ZW, Spitz RW, Dankel SJ, et al. The influence of biological sex and cuff width on muscle swelling, echo intensity, and the fatigue response to blood flow restricted exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences [Internet]. 2019 Aug 18;37(16):1865–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1599316

Merrigan JJ, White JB, Hu YE, Stone JD, Oliver JM, Jones MT. Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women. European journal of applied physiology. 2018 Nov;118(11):2359–66.

Hu C-F, Chen CP-C, Tsai W-C, Hu L-L, Hsu C-C, Tseng S-T, et al. Quantification of skeletal muscle fibrosis at different healing stages using sonography: a morphologic and histologic study in an animal model. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012 Jan;31(1):43–8.

Mayhew JL, Hancock K, Rollison L, Ball TE, Bowen JC. Contributions of strength and body composition to the gender difference in anaerobic power. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2001 Mar;41(1):33–8.

Soriano MA, Haff GG, Comfort P, Amaro-Gahete FJ, Torres-González A, García-Cifo A, et al. Is there a relationship between the overhead press and split jerk maximum performance? Influence of sex. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2021;174795412110204.

Girts RM, MacLennan RJ, Harmon KK, Stock MS. Is skeletal muscle echo intensity more indicative of voluntary or involuntary strength in young women? Translational Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2021 Feb 8;n/a(n/a). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.234

Akima H, Yoshiko A, Tomita A, Ando R, Saito A, Ogawa M, et al. Relationship between quadriceps echo intensity and functional and morphological characteristics in older men and women. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics [Internet]. 2017;70:105–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.01.014

Wilhelm EN, Rech A, Minozzo F, Radaelli R, Botton CE, Pinto RS. Relationship between quadriceps femoris echo intensity, muscle power, and functional capacity of older men. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) [Internet]. 2014/02/11. 2014 Jun;36(3):9625. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24515898

Publicado

2021-10-04

Cómo citar

Betta Canever, J., Betta, Diefenthaeler, F., & Lima, K. M. M. e . (2021). Influye el género en la intensidad del eco del cuádriceps femoral en individuos jóvenes y sanos? Influye el género en la intensidad del eco muscular?. Arquivos Brasileiros De Educação Física, 4(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.20873/abef.2595-0096.v4n1p124133

Artículos similares

1 2 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.