USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN BRAZIL

Authors

  • Sacha Clael Universidade de Brasília
  • Bárbara de Caldas Melo
  • Viviane Giusti Balestrin UnB
  • Breno de Sousa Santana
  • Wagner Rodrigues Martins UnB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70860/abef.25950096v75767

Keywords:

COVID-19, Google Forms, Word, Excel, PowerPoint

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the pedagogical structure of education, requiring teachers to use information and communication technologies (ICTs). However, there were challenges to this implementation, such as the lack of physical space and difficulty in using the tools. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to assess the knowledge of teachers from public and private higher education institutions in Brazil regarding ICTs. A survey was conducted using Google Forms and included 146 teachers. The first set of questions was used to characterize the sample and the second set was used to assess teachers' knowledge of ICTs. The level of comfort with tools such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Google for Education was used to measure the teachers' knowledge of ICTs. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze the association between the teacher's age and their knowledge of ICTs, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare the differences in ICT knowledge between public and private institutions. In general, it was observed that teachers have a good mastery of ICTs, with no significant association between the teacher's age and their knowledge of the tools (p > 0.05), and no difference in ICT knowledge between teachers from public and private institutions (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that higher education professors from public and private institutions in Brazil have a good knowledge of ICTs.

Keywords: Google Forms; Word; Excel; PowerPoint; COVID-19.

References

Singh RP, Javaid M, Haleem A, Suman R. Internet of things (IoT) applications to fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):521-4.

Schaffer MA, Sandau KE, Diedrick L. Evidence-based practice models for organizational change: overview and practical applications. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(5):1197-209.

Larsen CM, Terkelsen AS, Carlsen AF, Kristensen HK. Methods for teaching evidence-based practice: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):259.

Dua AB, Kilian A, Grainger R, Fantus SA, Wallace ZS, Buttgereit F, et al. Challenges, collaboration, and innovation in rheumatology education during the COVID-19 pandemic: leveraging new ways to teach. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(12):3535-41.

Glenn S. Information and communication technologies (ICT) in nursing education: is there a need for a more philosophical analysis? Nurse Educ Today. 2002;22(2):99-101.

Alonso KM. Tecnologias da informação e comunicação e formação de professores: sobre rede e escolas. Educação & Sociedade. 2008;29:747-68.

Al-Tamimi DM. Application of information and communication technologies in medical education. J Family Community Med. 2003;10(1):67-76.

Valcke M, De Wever B. Information and communication technologies in higher education: evidence-based practices in medical education. Med Teach. 2006;28(1):40-8.

Teixeira AL, Samora M, Vianna LC. Muscle metaboreflex activation via postexercise ischemia as a tool for teaching cardiovascular physiology for undergraduate students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(1):34-41.

Rashid T, Asghar HM. Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;63:604-12.

Javaid M, Haleem A, Vaishya R, Bahl S, Suman R, Vaish A. Industry 4.0 technologies and their applications in fighting COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):419-22.

Daniel SJ. Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects (Paris). 2020;49(1):1-6.

Momo FDS, Behr A, Marcolin CB, Farias EDS. Um Diagnóstico do uso das Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação (TICs) em uma Instituição de Ensino Superior. Revista de Empreendedorismo, Inovação e Tecnologia. 2017;4(2):18.

Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ. Research methods in physical activity: Human kinetics; 2015.

Das A, Mishra S. Questionnaire on Faculty Use of Technology for Teaching and Learning. 2016. p. 69-79.

Crawford J, Butler-Henderson K, Rudolph J, Malkawi B, Glowatz M, Burton R, et al. COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 2020;3(1):1-20.

Engel A, Salvador CC, Membrive A, Badenas JO. Information and communication technologies and students’ out-of-school learning experiences. Digital Education Review. 2018(33):130-49.

Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors–enablers and barriers–affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC medical education. 2020;20(1):1-18.

Atmacasoy A, Aksu M. Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. 2018;23(6):2399-422.

Pilabre AH, Ngangue P, Barro A, Pafadnam Y. An Imperative for the National Public Health School in Burkina Faso to Promote the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Critical Analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2021;7(2):e27169.

Published

2024-09-17

How to Cite

Clael, S., Melo, B. de C., Balestrin, V. G., Santana, B. de S., & Martins, W. R. (2024). USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN BRAZIL. Brazilian Archives of Physical Education, 7, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.70860/abef.25950096v75767

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.