le Fiabilité intra-évaluateur d'un nouveau dynamomètre isométrique pour l'évaluation de la force des extenseurs du tronc chez les jeunes adultes en bonne santé.
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.70860/abef_20255770Mots-clés :
Confiabilidade, Dinamometria, Força muscular, Torque, Fisioterapia, Extensor de troncoRésumé
Introduction : L'évaluation de la force musculaire du tronc est cruciale pour évaluer la performance physique et la stabilité posturale. Bien que les dynamomètres isocinétiques soient la référence pour ces mesures, leur coût et leur complexité limitent l'accessibilité. Des solutions de rechange plus pratiques et fiables sont nécessaires. Objectif : Déterminer la fiabilité intra-évaluateur d'un nouveau dynamomètre isométrique à cadre fixe pour évaluer la force des extenseurs du tronc chez les jeunes adultes en bonne santé. Méthodes : Cette étude de fiabilité intra-évaluateur a inclus 41 étudiants universitaires (13 hommes, 28 femmes). Les participants ont effectué trois contractions volontaires isométriques maximales (CVIM) d'extension du tronc en position assise standardisée au cours de deux séances, à une semaine d'intervalle. La fiabilité intra-évaluateur a été évaluée à l'aide d'un coefficient de corrélation intraclasse de cohérence à effets mixtes à 2 facteurs (ICC3,1), d'une erreur standard de mesure (SEM, SEM%) et d'un changement minimal détectable (MDC, MDC%). Résultats : La fiabilité intra-évaluateur était excellente (ICC = 0,90, IC à 95 % : 0,82–0,94), avec un SEM de 5,12 N (1,21 %) et une MDC de 6,27 N (1,39 %), indiquant une erreur de mesure minimale. Conclusions : Le nouveau dynamomètre isométrique a démontré une fiabilité intra-évaluateur élevée et une faible erreur de mesure, ce qui étaye son utilisation pour l'évaluation de la force des extenseurs du tronc chez les jeunes adultes en bonne santé. Les recherches futures devraient explorer son applicabilité aux populations cliniques et à différents groupes d'âge.
Références
Adogwa O, Reid MC, Chilakapati S, Makris UE. Clin‐STAR corner: 2021 update in musculoskeletal pain in older adults with a focus on osteoarthritis‐related pain. J Am Geriatr Soc. agosto de 2023;71(8):2373–80.
Chen J, Wang X, Xu Z. Sarcopenia and Chronic Pain in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Res. outubro de 2023;Volume 16:3569–81.
Reid MC, Eccleston C, Pillemer K. Management of chronic pain in older adults. BMJ. 13 de fevereiro de 2015;350:h532.
Schwan J, Sclafani J, Tawfik VL. Chronic Pain Management in the Elderly. Anesthesiol Clin. setembro de 2019;37(3):547–60.
Derry S, Conaghan P, Da Silva JAP, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group, organizador. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 22 de abril de 2016 [citado 20 de fevereiro de 2025];2020(2). Disponível em: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub3
Baker MK, Atlantis E, Fiatarone Singh MA. Multi-modal exercise programs for older adults. Age Ageing. julho de 2007;36(4):375–81.
Kechichian A, Lafrance S, Matifat E, Dubé F, Lussier D, Benhaim P, et al. Multimodal Interventions Including Rehabilitation Exercise for Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Geriatr Phys Ther. janeiro de 2022;45(1):34–49.
Honorato Dos Santos De Carvalho VC, Rossato SL, Fuchs FD, Harzheim E, Fuchs SC. Assessment of primary health care received by the elderly and health related quality of life: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. dezembro de 2013;13(1):605.
McEwen V, Esterlis MM, Lorello RG, Sud A, Englesakis FM, Bhatia A. A Scoping Review of Gaps Identified by Primary Care Providers in Caring for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain. Can J Pain Rev Can Douleur. 2023;7(1):2145940.
Morcillo-Muñoz Y, Castellano MHJ, Exposito FJD, Sanchez-Guarnido AJ, Alcantara MG, Baena-Parejo MI. Multimodal Interventions to Improve the Management of Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in Primary Care Using Participatory Research. Clin Pract. 26 de agosto de 2021;11(3):561–81.
Torres JL, Da Silva SLA, Ferreira FR, Mendes LPS, Machado LA. Chronic pain is associated with increased health care use among community-dwelling older adults in Brazil: the Pain in the Elderly (PAINEL) Study. Fam Pract. 8 de outubro de 2019;36(5):594–9.
Merkow RP, Kaji AH, Itani KMF. The CONSORT Framework. JAMA Surg. 1o de setembro de 2021;156(9):877.
Efird J. Blocked Randomization with Randomly Selected Block Sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 23 de dezembro de 2010;8(1):15–20.
Colado JC, Pedrosa FM, Juesas A, Gargallo P, Carrasco JJ, Flandez J, et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI-Resistance Exercise Scale of perceived exertion with elastic bands in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. março de 2018;103:11–6.
Neil-Sztramko SE, Teggart K, Moore C, Sherifali D, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Coletta G, et al. Community-based group physical activity and/or nutrition interventions to promote mobility in older adults: an umbrella review. BMC Geriatr. 29 de junho de 2022;22(1):539.
Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. novembro de 2001;94(2):149–58.
Domingues L, Cruz E. Adaptação Cultural e Contributo para a Validação da Escala. 2.
Agarwala P, Salzman SH. Six-Minute Walk Test: Clinical Role, Technique, Coding, and Reimbursement. Chest. março de 2020;157(3):603–11.
Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s Chair-Stand Test as a Measure of Lower Body Strength in Community-Residing Older Adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. junho de 1999;70(2):113–9.
Poolman RW, Struijs PAA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Marti RK, Farrokhyar F, et al. Reporting of Outcomes in Orthopaedic Randomized Trials: Does Blinding of Outcome Assessors Matter? J Bone Jt Surg. março de 2007;89(3):550–8.
McCoy CE. Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials. West J Emerg Med. outubro de 2017;18(6):1075–8.
Melo DMD, Barbosa AJG. O uso do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental em pesquisas com idosos no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. dezembro de 2015;20(12):3865–76.
Santiago-Bravo G, Sudo FK, Assunção N, Drummond C, Mattos P. Dementia screening in Brazil: a systematic review of normative data for the mini-mental state examination. Clinics. 2019;74:e971.
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. agosto de 2004;8(4):283–91.
Olsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, Tendal B, Hilden J, Hróbjartsson A. Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies. J Clin Epidemiol. setembro de 2018;101:87-106.e2.
Sluka KA, Frey-Law L, Hoeger Bement M. Exercise-induced pain and analgesia? Underlying mechanisms and clinical translation. Pain. setembro de 2018;159(1):S91–7.
Rice D, Nijs J, Kosek E, Wideman T, Hasenbring MI, Koltyn K, et al. Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Pain-Free and Chronic Pain Populations: State of the Art and Future Directions. J Pain. novembro de 2019;20(11):1249–66.
Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. abril de 2017;23(2):377–81.
Mikkelsen MK, Lund CM, Vinther A, Tolver A, Johansen JS, Chen I, et al. Effects of a 12-Week Multimodal Exercise Intervention Among Older Patients with Advanced Cancer: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. The Oncologist. 3 de fevereiro de 2022;27(1):67–78.
Barisch-Fritz B, Trautwein S, Scharpf A, Krell-Roesch J, Woll A. Effects of a 16-Week Multimodal Exercise Program on Physical Performance in Individuals With Dementia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Geriatr Phys Ther. janeiro de 2022;45(1):3–24.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Brazilian Archives of Physical Education 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Proposta de Aviso de Direito Autoral Creative Commons
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
