An evaluation of Ukrainian future teachers’ of humanities readiness for e-education

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e11577

Resumo

Uma avaliação da prontidão dos futuros professores ucranianos de humanidades para a educação eletrônica

O artigo centra-se na disponibilidade dos estudantes para o ensino em linha nas instituições de ensino superior pedagógico ucraniano, uma vez que o ensino à distância não é apenas uma nova tecnologia de aprendizagem para os futuros professores, mas também o objeto do seu estudo e posterior aplicação na carreira pedagógica. O estudo utilizou os questionários dos autores para 120 docentes e 320 estudantes, observações e testes de diagnóstico. Para avaliar a atual disponibilidade dos estudantes para a aprendizagem eletrônica, foram utilizados os seguintes critérios: independência na aquisição de conhecimentos, atividade cognitiva, métodos de domínio das atividades educativas em linha. São dadas características dos níveis de prontidão dos estudantes para o e-learning. Confirma-se a necessidade de formação inicial de professores e estudantes para a utilização de tecnologias de ensino à distância. A análise dos dados da investigação revelou, sobretudo um nível médio e suficiente de independência de aprendizagem dos futuros professores, atividade cognitiva e experiência de aplicação de atividades educativas em linha. São descritas posições conceptuais básicas e condições para uma aprendizagem eletrônica eficaz nas instituições de ensino superior pedagógico ucranianas como pré-requisitos para a prontidão dos estudantes para a educação eletrônica.

Palavras-chave: educação à distância, prontidão para a educação eletrônica, estudantes, futuro professor.

 

An evaluation of Ukrainian future teachers’ of humanities readiness for e-education

ABSTRACT. The article focuses on the students’ readiness for online education in Ukrainian pedagogical higher education institutions, since distance learning is not only a new learning technology for teachers-to-be, but also the object of their study and further application in the pedagogical career. The study employed the authors’ questionnaires for 120 faculty members and 320 students, observations and diagnostic tests. To assess the students’ current readiness for e-learning, the following criteria were employed: independence in the acquisition of knowledge, cognitive activity, mastering methods of online education activities. Characteristics of levels of students’ readiness for e-learning are given. The need for initial training of teachers and students to use distance learning technologies is confirmed. Analysis of research data revealed mostly medium and sufficient level of teachers’-to-be independence of learning, cognitive activity and experience of application of online educational activities. Basic conceptual positions and conditions for effective e-learning in Ukrainian pedagogical higher education institutions as prerequisites for students’ readiness for e-education are described.

Keywords: distance education, readiness for e-education, students, future teacher.

 

Una evaluación de la preparación de los futuros profesores de humanidades ucranianos para la educación electrónica

RESUMEN. El artículo se centra en la preparación de los estudiantes para la enseñanza en línea en las instituciones de educación superior pedagógica ucranianas, ya que el aprendizaje a distancia no es sólo una nueva tecnología de aprendizaje para los futuros profesores, sino también el objeto de su estudio y posterior aplicación en la carrera pedagógica. El estudio utilizó los cuestionarios de los autores para 120 profesores y 320 alumnos, observaciones y pruebas de diagnóstico. Para evaluar la preparación actual de los estudiantes para el aprendizaje electrónico, se utilizaron los siguientes criterios: independencia en la adquisición de conocimientos, actividad cognitiva, métodos de dominio de las actividades educativas en línea. Se indican las características de los niveles de preparación de los alumnos para el aprendizaje electrónico. Se confirma la necesidad de formación inicial de profesores y alumnos para el uso de las tecnologías de aprendizaje a distancia. El análisis de los datos de la investigación reveló principalmente un nivel medio y suficiente de independencia del aprendizaje, la actividad cognitiva y la experiencia de aplicación de las actividades educativas en línea de los futuros profesores. Se describen las posiciones conceptuales básicas y las condiciones para un aprendizaje electrónico eficaz en las instituciones de educación superior pedagógica ucranianas como requisitos previos para la preparación de los estudiantes para la educación electrónica.

Palabras clave: educación a distancia, preparación para la educación electrónica, estudiantes, futuro profesor.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Vadim Tkachenko , Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National University at Cherkasy, Ukraine

Ph. D., Associate Professor. Range of scientific interest: educational management, health technologies in education, anti-crisis management, recreational and animation activities.

Vadym Chychuk , Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Ukraine

Ph.D., Lecturer of Information Technologies Sciences. Chairman of the Council of Young Scientists of the Faculty of Engineering and Pedagogical Education. Range of scientific interest: multimedia technologies in education, digital education, teacher self-education.

Mykola Zakharevich , Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Ukraine

Ph.D., Lecturer of Information Technologies Sciences. Range of scientific interests: information and communication competence of a teacher, information culture, multimedia technologies in education.

Yuliia Nenko, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine, Ukraine

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of Foreign Languages Department. Ukrainian educator and philologist, the author of over 80 scientific works, including 1 monograph, 8 text-books, Terminology dictionaries on rescue (Ukrainian-Russian-English and Ukrainian-Polish-English).

Referências

Alexander, B., Adams-Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Hall-Giesinger, C. (2017). Digital Literacy in Higher Education, Part II: An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief, 3, 4. Austin, Texas: The New media Consortium.

Assareh, A., & Bidokht, H. M. (2011). Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 791–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129

Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillenial learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7-12.

Dubey, P., & Pandey, D. (2020). Distance learning in higher education during pandemic: challenges and opportunities. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 43-46.

Gende, D. (2020). Redesigning assessments for remote learning. The Physics Teacher, 58(6), 440-441. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001849

Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2018). E-Teaching in Higher Education: An Essential Prerequisite for E-Learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.298

Ivanchenko, E., & Masliy, O. (2018). Introduction of innovative pedagogical technologies and methods in higher military education - a guarantee of improving its quality. Health and Safety Pedagogy, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31649/2524-1079-2018-3-1-001-008 [in Ukrainian]

Kolcu, G., Demir, S., Gülle, K., Atay, T., Kolcu, M. I. B., & Koşar, A. (2020). Evaluation of Transition to Distance Education in COVİD-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-35396/v1.

Lage, A., Pessoa, T., & Costa, R. (2019). Formative Trajectory for Distance Teaching. Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334278459_Formative_Trajectory_for_Distance_Teaching.

Mikušková, E., & Verešová, M. (2020). Distance education during COVID-19: the perspective of Slovak teachers. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78, 884-906. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.884.

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Mitchell, N. (2020). Universities not ready for online learning – U-Multirank. University World News. Retrieved from: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200609183303614

Moti, F. (2008). Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Environments. Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch128

Nenko, Y., Кybalna, N., & Snisarenko, Y. (2020). The COVID-19 Distance Learning: Insight from Ukrainian students. Brazilian Journal Of Rural Education, 5, e8925. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e8925

Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers, and millennials: Understanding the new students. Educause Review, 38(4), 37-47.

Ochavillo, G. S. (2020). A Paradigm Shift of Learning in Maritime Education amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p164

Oliynyk, V. (2001). Distance education abroad and in Ukraine: a concise analytical review. Kyiv: TsIPPO.

Osadcha, K. P. (2018). The Problem of Future Teachers’ Professional Training for Tutor Activities in the Pedagogical Theory. Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko: Pedagogical Sciences, 4(90), 109–115. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/141498862.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Pappas, C. (2017, January 15). Eight best practices to create learner-centered eLearning courses. eLearning Industry. Retrieved from: https://elearningindustry.com/millenial-learning-needs-3-reasons-not-ignore

Prata-Linhares, M. M., Cardoso, T. D. S. G., Lopes-Jr, D. S., & Zukowsky-Tavares, C. (2020). Social distancing effects on the teaching systems and teacher education programmes in Brazil: reinventing without distorting teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1800406

Rayuwati, R. (2020). How educational technology innovates distance learning during pandemic crisis in remote areas in Indonesia?. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(6), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n6.1032

Rudenko, E., Bachieva, R., Aligadzhieva, A., Temirhanova, Z., & Archilaeva, A. (2020). Distance learning during the pandemic: managing the challenges. E3S Web Conf., 210, 18038. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018038

The New Normal of Digital Learning Post COVID-19. (2020). An Insight into the Technology world. Retrieved from: https://savvycomsoftware.com/the-new-normal-of-digital-learning-post-covid-19/

Ubachs, G., Konings, L., & Brown, M. (Eds.) (2017). The Envisioning Report for Empowering Universities. Maastricht, NL: EADTU.

Zakharova, I. G. (2005). Information technologies in education: textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Academy, 192 p. [in Russian].

Skills that make a great online school teacher. (2020). Connections Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.connectionsacademy.com/support/resources/article/9-skills-that-make-great-online-school-teacher

Publicado

2021-04-28

Como Citar

Tkachenko , V., Chychuk , V., Zakharevich , M., & Nenko, Y. (2021). An evaluation of Ukrainian future teachers’ of humanities readiness for e-education. Revista Brasileira De Educação Do Campo, 6, e11577. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e11577

Edição

Seção

Artigos / Articles / Artículos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)